<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Privacy on Romit Raj</title><link>https://www.romitraj.com/tags/privacy/</link><description>Recent content in Privacy on Romit Raj</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.romitraj.com/tags/privacy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>SB 690 explainer: one door closes, two stay open</title><link>https://www.romitraj.com/posts/2026-10-17-sb-690-one-door-closes/</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.romitraj.com/posts/2026-10-17-sb-690-one-door-closes/</guid><description>California took the most common website-tracking lawsuit away from private plaintiffs. What closed, what stayed open, and what the retroactivity clause does to the cases already in court.</description></item></channel></rss>